Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/newspeak/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 472

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/newspeak/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 487

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/newspeak/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 494

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/newspeak/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 530

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/newspeak/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/newspeak/public_html/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/newspeak/public_html/wp-includes/theme.php on line 623
Hot or Not: Carrie McCandless? : Newspeakblog.com

Heterosexual Hall of Fame

January 07



The Denver Post is reporting that McCandless, who was one of our original inductees into the Colorado Heterosexual Hall of Fame, is being offered a plea deal of some kind for her involvement with a poor, helpless 17-year-old football player.

I’m fond of this detail:

The student said the two also “made out” once in the parking lot of a Sam’s Club, the affidavit states.

Must’ve been that musky scent of the 200 pack of toilet paper that got them all hot and bothered. I’m sure he’ll be scarred for life.

Posted by: marinaeckler in Heterosexual Hall of Fame | Permalink

Comments

27 Responses to “Hot or Not: Carrie McCandless?”

  1. wob on January 23rd, 2007 10:41 am

    If I was a 17yo, I’d definitely fuck her. Cmon, every straight male has fantasized about some hot teacher in school. If I were that kid, I woulda made the homerun first before ratting her out.

  2. z on January 23rd, 2007 5:52 pm

    Even better from the affadavit — which you can find on the Rocky Mountain News site at denver.rockymountainnews.com/art/news/120606teacher/1.shtml:

    “_____ said everyone had gone to sleep and he laid on the floor with Carrie in the front room. They began to ‘make out.’ He stated she rubbed his penis over the clothes and he rubbed her vaginal area, also over the clothes. _____ said he also reached up her shirt and fondled her breasts.”

    I guess that’s why cops don’t write romance novels.

  3. Dave on January 30th, 2007 2:14 pm

    Where were all these hot, nympho teachers when I was in school? Christ, all my teachers looked like Aunt Bea from the Andy Griffith Show. DAMN !!!! (These kids aren’t victims…..they’re lucky bastards !!!!!)

  4. Anonymous on February 10th, 2007 11:17 pm

    What 17 y.o. making out with his teacher is ever a victim? Give me a break! If anything I would say the guy took advantage of the teacher. He should be the one being punished for even saying a word. The real victim here I think is Carrie McCandless. The girl is hot!

    The problem with all these boys are they have never been taught the lessons of being a man. You simply don’t spill the beans to the world. They’re just a real bunch of little girls. I could see where a girl is victimized by an older man … not the other way around. Males are simply different than females at that age.

  5. ES on February 10th, 2007 11:59 pm

    The previous comment, by ___ seems so way out I wonder if it’s parody (not the first time I took something said in fun, seriously).
    Sure she’s cute. But you know what? most of the guy teachers involved in these things have been cute too.
    And you are right, too, that, perhaps, most 17 year old boys are more ready to drop their pants than girls (although that may be a real question these days).
    The point is, no 17 year old is ready to have sex with someone ten years older. Their bodies may be ready, but their heads are not

  6. Anonymous on March 13th, 2007 7:41 am

    I had a hot teacher in high school. I spent lots of time in the bathroom “thinking” about her…..this kid is so lucky to do what I fantasized about! He’s not scared…he’s spoiled for life.

  7. erica on March 13th, 2007 10:09 pm

    she was the best teacher i ever had..she is down to earth…and she tought me so much…she was my friend when no body was and stood up for me when the other children in school were mean to me…she is a great person and she should not be in jail….or prison ever…

  8. Anonymous on March 13th, 2007 10:29 pm

    i refuse to believe he’ll be scarred for life. i bet he’ll be jerking off to that happy memory until he’s 90!

  9. bigpoppa on March 13th, 2007 11:05 pm

    If you think this kid is not going to be harmed in the long term and that he will have a lifetime of wonderful memories, you are sadly mistaken. There are a lot of us men out here who were taken advantage of by older women who have to now deal with all the issues that these situations bring with them. It’s called rape and the kid will have far deeper psychological issues than most are willing to believe. His relationships with women will not be normal. These comments show exactly why our society is so messed up. Its not ok to do this with younger girls but it is with younger boys? PLEASE!

  10. atomicelroy on March 14th, 2007 8:42 am

    Oh THAT’S why are society’s messed up!
    Perhaps if we were not such a sexually repressed society none of this shit would matter. I think it’s the Uptight Xtians who’s puritanical domination of our society’s sexual morals that cause all sexual perversity. They can’t deal with their own sexuality and so it comes out in an unhealthy manner.

  11. darksandal on March 14th, 2007 8:45 am

    What bothers, Big Poppa, is that our society calls an 18-year-old a consenting adult and a 17-year-old a hapless, helpless victim of rape or sexual abuse. I don’t personally feel it’s any different when it’s a male teacher and a female student. Sure, the issue is one of power and teachers shouldn’t be having sex with their students, but come on, no 16 or 17-year-old is a helpless victim. You can’t call it child rape because it ’s not the same thing.

  12. Hot4Preacher on March 14th, 2007 9:00 am

    Bigpoppa - you are the VERY ESSENCE of satire! I’m weeping with laughter. “There are a lot of us men out here who were taken advantage of by older women who have to now deal with all the issues that these situations bring with them”

    COMEDY GOLD!!

  13. Klayton Elliot Kendall on March 14th, 2007 10:50 am

    The real question isn’t: “Who among us would have loved a piece of that creamy little Nordic ass when we were 17?” It’s: “Who among us would have fought the temptation to turn this teacher into the police and collect a million dollars from the school district?” The sexy details of the criminal trial ALWAYS overshadow the civil suit that follows. The fact is, kids (and the greedy parents who support them) are making big bucks off this shit. I don’t give a goddamn if that kid is scarred for life, or if he beats off everyday to all the great memories, or if he waits until Carrie gets out of prison and marries her. The point is: his parents will sue the school district, and they’ll win. So, all the males out there who fantasize about banging your teacher: it’s completely natural. But would you be a dick afterwards when your heart gets broken and some lawyer promises you bags of cash? That’s the decision that separates the men from the boys. The sexual component of this issue is really not that interesting.

  14. darksandal on March 14th, 2007 10:57 am

    touche, K

  15. anna banana on June 9th, 2007 2:37 am

    Klayton is right on. I don’t know if you want a feminist voice here, but I’ll give you one. The same logic is behind so-called pro-life laws that make it a crime for a minor 16 or 17 year old woman to get an abortion without parental consent, which is the law in a lot of states. The idea isn’t to help minors make decisions in difficult cases, most get adequate information from doctors, clinics, counselors, etc, nor is it to get parents involved, as most minors tell their parents if they have a good rapport.

    The idea is to make it very difficult for minors to get abortions, and if they do, to have to work with a lawyer, a counselor, a social worker, etc, etc, running up hundreds of dollars an hour in legal fees and thousands of dollars an hour in court costs. The minor doesn’t pay the legal fees, either taxpayers do or in some cases the clinics do. Laws like these are not opposed much when antichoice groups try to pass these laws in part because many adults approve of the idea of parental consent laws, but also because there’s a growing legal / social service bureaucracy that makes money off of it and actively supports it (and doesn’t in any case want it abolished).

    Because of McCandless’s supervisory relationship with a 17-year-old boy, I think it’s reasonable to charge her with a crime, but I think beyond that, from what I have heard of the case, it’s blowing the crime out of proportion to label her a sex offender for life. A minimal criminal penalty and counseling should be enough to deter her from future incidents. And no the kid’s parents shouldn’t get a million-dollar settlement. But I won’t be surprised if they get it, and if their lawyers get a very big chunk of it for fees, of course.

  16. anna rosannadana on June 9th, 2007 5:54 am

    Oh, one other penalty, which is obvious, but is rarely mentioned in news coverage of “predators” like McCandless…she should be fired from her position as a teacher. I’m sure she was, but now what? Where is she going to work next? Won’t she need to mention that she was arrested and convicted of something? Sure. And the employer will weigh that in considering whether or not to hire her.

    Basically I think the same thing should apply to a male teacher accused of the same thing in a case like this, as I understand the case. Minimal criminal penalty, counseling, and she’ll/he’ll have to live with this for the rest of her / his life. It makes the job of tracking, busting, convicting, and monitoring much more serious sex offenders more difficult in so many ways to label someone like McCandless a sex predator, and to require her to register as such for what I assume will be for the rest of her life.

    Some may say that in other cases predators, usually men, have moved and gotten jobs again as teachers or in other supervisory roles and continued to take advantage of minors. I’m sure that’s happened, but where it happens, I still don’t think it’s necessary to label offenders like McCandless a sex predator to keep other offenders from getting jobs again as teachers, etc — schools should do a better job of background checks, rather than broadening the definition of what more serious predators do to label relatively low-risk, consensual cases involving older minors like this as predatory.

    For another perpective on a situation like this, check out the 1970s film “Coach” with Cathy Lee Crosby:

    http://www.scoopy.com/coach.htm

    http://www.amazon.com/Coach-Cathy-Lee-Crosby/dp/6305826811

    And yeah, it was rated “PG”. Of course, the high school basketball player in “Coach” was 18 in the movie, but still…

  17. rastaman on August 19th, 2007 9:23 am

    I am a huge fan of Carrie — and I think she’s really hot — but it bothers me that if the 29 year-old teacher had been a guy and the 17-year old had been a girl, the guy would be in jail, castrated or perhaps both.

  18. Marie on August 19th, 2007 11:19 am

    I remember the good old days when your hot male middle-aged (35-ish) gym teacher could tuck a note in your pocket telling you how nice your ass looked in gym shorts and you felt nothing but pride. Those blissful times when he invited you to stay after class so he could help you perfect your cartwheel before cheerleading tryouts. The car washes where you accidentally wore a thin white cotton t-shirt and he accidentally sprayed you with water. The bake sales when he wandered by, arms full of clipboards and whistles, and asked that you feed him a cookie and then commented that he knew you’d taste delicious (sadly, that one was lost on me for quite a while). All of these were happy moments. Special moments. Confidence-building events. Certainly NOTHING I’d mention to my parents. Nor try to make money from.

    We live in a messed up world.

  19. J on October 19th, 2007 5:24 pm

    Im not sure what the big deal is , over here in the Uk the age of consent is 16

  20. Aussie on November 12th, 2007 12:24 am

    Wasn’t her husband the school principal? I bet he has a handfull now … much like the student did too by the sound of it. The kid will have legendary status for years

  21. Trudeaux on January 9th, 2008 2:13 pm

    When I was 17, I tried like hell to get it on with a 23 year old. She was all for it until she got scared someone would find out. What a bummer! I still regret that she was too afraid to go for it. Traumatized? No way! 17 year-old guys are not traumatized by getting laid by a beautiful older woman. I’m now in my late 40’s and STILL wish that older woman hadn’t backed down.

  22. Michael on June 26th, 2008 6:46 pm

    i dont think that football player was helpless.

  23. Anonymous on July 11th, 2008 10:42 pm

    @darksandal: “Do I sense the presence of women-folk in here?”
    :-)

  24. Aurora on July 11th, 2008 10:47 pm

    I had sex with an adult man when I was 16. I only have fond memories of it and I am a woman. Now I am married and have a healthy emotional and sexual relationship with my husband…is it maybe because I am european?

  25. Greg Reilly on July 12th, 2008 4:00 am

    Fucking Europeans.

    You ruin the family model for all of us! For shame!

    I should not post or comment while I am drunk.

    The end.

  26. Aunt Lobelia on July 12th, 2008 9:43 am

    I can never understand why 17 year olds can join the army and die for their country, but they are not adult enough to have sex, drink or vote.

  27. Humbert Humbert on July 12th, 2008 11:29 am

    A few rotten child molesters spoil it for all of us.

Leave a Reply







  • Recent Comments


  • Warning: get_object_vars() expects parameter 1 to be object, null given in /home/newspeak/public_html/wp-includes/taxonomy.php on line 324


  • Warning: get_object_vars() expects parameter 1 to be object, null given in /home/newspeak/public_html/wp-includes/taxonomy.php on line 324


  • Warning: get_object_vars() expects parameter 1 to be object, null given in /home/newspeak/public_html/wp-includes/taxonomy.php on line 324

    • Fr. Armstrong Dell Fund
    • NEWSPEAK Blog: COS Prog Blogs
    • NEWSPEAK Blog: CultureCast
    • Newspeak Flickr